THE ECONOMIST: Lying in Ponds gets a favorable mention in the Economist today, in a profile on Paul Krugman called "The one-handed economist". For those visiting for the first time with an interest in Mr. Krugman, my best recent summary of his work is here. Coincidentally, next week I'll be posting an analysis of his 2001 columns, which I've just finished.
MORAL POLITICS: My colleague Andrew Cline praises George Lakoff's book Moral Politics so frequently that I finally had to give in a while back and read it. There are many things in the book which I don't agree with, but I do agree with Andrew that Mr. Lakoff's central thesis is right on target -- that most of the differences between liberals and conservatives can be understood as resulting from two competing moral worldviews, which he calls "Strict Father Morality" (conservatives) and "Nurturant Parent Morality" (liberals):
. . . So far as I can tell, the main issue in every conservative political policy is morality -- good versus evil. There is nothing surprising in this. Conservatives consider themselves moral people and they talk about morality and the family constantly. But to liberals, who have their own very different moral system, conservative policies are so immoral that any conservative discussion of morality is taken as demagoguery.Of course, liberals also see their policies as moral and their overall politics as serving moral goals. Conservatives, however, talk as if liberals were degenerates opposed to morality; as if they were corrupted by special interests; as if they loved expensive and inefficient bureaucracy; as if they wanted to take away the rights of citizens. Each side sees the other as immoral, corrupt, and lunkheaded. Neither side wants to see the other as moral in any way. Neither side wants to recognize that there are two, opposed, highly-structured, well-grounded, widely accepted, and utterly contradictory moral systems at the center of American politics.
The failure to see that politics is fundamentally about morality demeans American politics. It makes all politicians look immoral. And it hides the deep logic behind political positions.
| Author/ Affiliation |
Title/ Date |
words | PI | Partisan References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Krugman New York Times |
The Trojan Horse 14 November 2003 |
775 | 100 | 2D+: Democrats, Edward Kennedy 2R-: Barry Goldwater, Republicans |
| Richard Cohen Washington Post |
A Hero for Telling the Truth 14 November 2003 |
858 | 100 | 1R-: White House |
| Michael Kinsley Washington Post |
The Limits of Eloquence 14 November 2003 |
1160 | 69 | 1D+: Al Gore 10R-: Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush, George W. Bush, Bush, Bush, Bush 1D=, 4R= |
| Daniel Henninger WSJ OpinionJournal |
Howard Scores 14 November 2003 |
1204 | 68 | 2D+: Howard Dean, Dean 16D-: Kerry, Dean, John Kerry, Democrats, Kerry, John Kerry, Dick Gephardt, John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, Wes Clark, John Kerry, John Kerry, Kerry, Al Sharpton, Bill Clinton, Democratic 3R+: Bush, George W. Bush, George Bush 3D=, 1R= |
| Molly Ivins Creators Syndicate |
180 in Iraq? 14 November 2003 |
918 | 60 | 6R-: administration, administration, Bush administration, Bush, administration, Bush administration 4R= |
| Mona Charen Creators Syndicate |
Jessica Lynch: Modern Myth 14 November 2003 |
866 | 33 | 1D-: Clinton administration 1D=, 1R= |
| E. J. Dionne Jr. Washington Post |
Is Dean Goldwater? 14 November 2003 |
1090 | 18 | 16D+: Dean, Dean, Kerry, Richard A. Gephardt, Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Lyndon B. Johnson, Dean, Dean 6D-: Howard Dean, Dean, Dean, Dean, Howard Dean, Democrats 6R+: Republicans, Republican Party, Barry Goldwater, Goldwater, Goldwater, Goldwater 6R-: Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, Bush, Goldwater, Goldwater 19D=, 4R= |
| David Ignatius Inactive |
Check That Oil 14 November 2003 |
819 | 0 | |
| Charles Krauthammer Washington Post |
Success On the High Seas 14 November 2003 |
845 | 0 | |
| Thomas Sowell Creators Syndicate |
Free-lunch medicine: part II 14 November 2003 |
753 | 0 |