lying in ponds
The absurdity of partisanship
Home | About | Philosophy | Methods | Contact | FAQ | 2002 | 2003

Pundit Boxscore for Tuesday 26 April 2005

Lines in yellow indicate a substantive crossover column, meaning that the column is of opposite sign to the pundit's Normalized Total PI for the season, and contains at least five non-neutral partisan references.
Lines in gray indicate that the pundit has been classified as inactive, meaning that their columns are not currently being evaluated for partisanship.
Democratic references in blue, Republican in red, positive references in bold, negative in italics.
Author/
Affiliation
Title/
Date
words PI Partisan References
Molly Ivins
Creators Syndicate
Christian right goes nuclear
26 April 2005
952 87 3D+,10R-,2R=
04.26.05 -: President Bush
Who changed: Republican Party, Republicans, Republican Party
Since this: Trent Lott, Republicans
In fact,: Republican Party
Actually, no: Republicans
But the: Democrats, Bush, Bush, Republicans
Since what: Republican
That is: Robert Byrd, Byrd
E. J. Dionne Jr.
Washington Post
Revolt of the Middle
26 April 2005
1003 69 15D+,1D-,4D=,1R+,14R-,4R=
But something: President Bush, the president, Republicans, Bush
The moderates: Bill Clinton, Bush, Bush, John Kerry
The latest: Democratic, Stan Greenberg, James Carville, Greenberg, Carville, Democrats, Republicans, Democrats, Democrats
But one: Republicans
When they: Democrats, Kerry, Bush
And in: Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Clinton, Bush, Carville, Clinton
In light: Senate Republican, Bill Frist, Republicans, The president
All this,: Republican, Democrats, Democrats
That's why: GOP, Republican, Greenberg, Carville, Republicans
Nicholas D. Kristof
New York Times
N. Korea, 6, and Bush, 0
26 April 2005
978 50 2D+,1D=,2R+,10R-,5R=
N. Korea,: Bush
(1) How: Bill Clinton
(2) How: President Bush
The single: Bush administration, Bush
In fairness,: Bush, administration
But if: Bush administration, Colin Powell, Bush
You don't: Bush administration, administration, Clinton
A bit: Bush administration, Clinton administration
Instead, Mr.: Bush
Now the: administration
It's more: administration
But Mr.: Bush
The irony: Bush
Thomas Sowell
Creators Syndicate
Disinformation on judges
26 April 2005
868 18 3D-,2R+,3R-,3R=
The future: Democrats
 Democrats are: Democrats, Republicans, Senate Republicans
 Undoubtedly there: Republicans, Democrats
 Even some: Republicans, President Bush, Solicitor General Theodore Olson
 Did anyone: Reagan administration, President Reagan
John Tierney
New York Times
The Proof's in the Pension
26 April 2005
842 0
Richard Cohen
Washington Post
Evil's Willing Followers
26 April 2005
829 0